nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:55:24 -1000
I'm not saying that the practice is good, or recommended, or without peril. But it's certainly not isolated to the UK.
perhaps it should be :-) as folk from all over read this list, i just could not let discussion of how to do something that is generally broken and quite ill-advised go without raising a red flag. i would recommend all my competitors do this, except, as it is being done to exchange meshes, it is damaging to all. randy
Current thread:
- Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Simon Brilus (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Steven Bakker (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Joe Abley (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Robert Kiessling (Nov 09)
- RE: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Chris Roberts (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Will Hargrave (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Peering VLANs and MAC addresses Mike Hughes (Nov 09)