nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 12:05:34 -0400
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
It would be nice if the ISPs protected me from bad stuff on the Internet - but why are they to be held to a higher standard than similar services?
Have we drifted? I thought the topic was "tragedy of the commons", not "protect the end users"...? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
Current thread:
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dave Rand (May 01)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Andrews (May 01)