nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:27:57 +0200
* Suresh Ramasubramanian:
On 29/07/05, Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:Anyway, you should examine *why* you (or your customers) are attacked, and address that. Everything else is likely cost-effective. Of course, this might mean you have to do without some revenue if you have customers that are DoS magnets for some reason.Not allowing your users to run eggdrop or other irc bots on the shells you give them, and generally not hosting irc stuff would definitely help there.
Definitely. You should also help your customer to detect successful break-ins. Compromised machines are often used in very questionable contexts and quickly become targets of DoS attacks as well (not your average owned home computer, of course, it's more about multi-user UNIX machines).
Current thread:
- Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services James Feger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services chip (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)