nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:44:56 +0530
On 29/07/05, Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:
Anyway, you should examine *why* you (or your customers) are attacked, and address that. Everything else is likely cost-effective. Of course, this might mean you have to do without some revenue if you have customers that are DoS magnets for some reason.
Not allowing your users to run eggdrop or other irc bots on the shells you give them, and generally not hosting irc stuff would definitely help there. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services James Feger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services chip (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)