nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up
From: "Geo." <geoincidents () nls net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:02:17 -0400
I think he's just pointing out that the risk assessments of many
network operators are way off.<< I think there is also a LOT concern about all the unpatched routers that remain unpatched simply because the admins don't feel like spending a week running the cisco gauntlet to get patches when you don't have a support contract with cisco. Its like cisco doesn't want you to patch or they would make it easy. Geo.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up, (continued)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Jeff Kell (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Daniel Golding (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Network Fortius (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Jason Frisvold (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Jeff Kell (Jul 27)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Florian Weimer (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Geo. (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up John A. Kilpatrick (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up James Baldwin (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up James Baldwin (Jul 28)