Re: Fundamental changes to Internet architecture

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:

> Yeah, I saw that...
>
> With all respect to Dave, and not to sound too skeptical,
> but we're pretty far along in our current architecture to
> "fundamentally" change, don't you think (emphasis on
> fundamentally)?
>
>  
Most of the routing and security issues on todays IP4/IP6 internet could 
be solved by deploying HIP or derivatives thereof without requiring 
fundamental changes to the infrastructure since the major "flaw" of 
current generation Internet is tying the network identity and 
host/application indentity into one which is then overcome with whole 
spectrum of solutions along the lines of anycast, load-balancers, NAT, etc.

Pete

> - ferg
>
>
> -- Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
>
> I guess I'm not the only one who thinks that we could benefit from some 
> fundamental changes to Internet architecture.
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,68004,00.html?tw=wn_6techhead
>
> Dave Clark is proposing that the NSF should fund a new demonstration 
> network that implements a fundamentally new architecture at many levels.
>
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
> Engineering Architecture for the Internet
> fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
> ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
>
>