nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: "Geo." <geoincidents () nls net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:10:29 -0400
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Groenewald" <ivang () xtrahost co uk>
Applying patches to binaries, hmmmmm. Sounds a bit difficult.
It's actually quite simple, you do a compare between the old binary and the new and the patch contains only the differences. It's a very effective way to do patches in a non dll type world because it's efficient size wise and it requires that you already have the product so manual verification isn't necessary. I think it would work well for Cisco's IOS patch requirements. Geo.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry, (continued)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Roy Badami (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry JC Dill (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Tony Li (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Dan Hollis (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry C. Jon Larsen (Jul 30)