nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:53:06 +0100
This isn't trivial to do, but it isn't rocket science either!
True, but you ARE suggesting that Cisco produce a binary patch, to a possibly compressed image. I think you should really think long and hard before you conclude that you really want that. IMHO, the risk/reward ratio as compared to just downloading a full image is all wrong. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry, (continued)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Roy Badami (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry JC Dill (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Tony Li (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)