nanog mailing list archives
Re: NETGEAR in the core...
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:57:02 -0400
Rob
Only suitable one is the 1605R (because you would never dial on the same ethernet that your lan is on right?)Can a cisco 1600 run PPPoE?I've never tried it, but if they can run 12.2, they should do PPPoE. R
20mb flash card and 16mb SIMM you have around and your up and running with 12.3
Go with 1720 and 48/16flash and you still require a WIC-1ENET. (cheaper than 1721 however since cisco pppoe dialer does not support dot1q [for absolutely no good reason] it makes little difference)
Cisco has targeted this segment with the 83x series....they are fairly decent but you would need to run 123T/124
You can also target this with the obsolete 2610,2620,2621,3620......using Network modules with additional ethernets.
Joe
Current thread:
- NETGEAR in the core... Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Henry Yen (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Joe Maimon (Jul 30)
- RE: NETGEAR in the core... Sam Crooks (Jul 31)
- Message not available
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Henry Yen (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Janet Sullivan (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Brad Knowles (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Roy (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Arnold Nipper (Jul 31)