nanog mailing list archives
Re: NETGEAR in the core...
From: Robert Boyle <robert () tellurian com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:34 -0400
At 11:32 PM 7/30/2005, Henry Yen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:11:28AM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote: > >I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers > >functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP > >and routing a /29 or a /28. A sane filtering language and stateful > >firewall that can operate in non-NAT mode is a plus. > http://www.cyberguard.com/products/firewall/SG_Family/ I think linux runs inside those. Vendor-supplied, yes, but if the OP wants to avoid linux altogether...
That's correct. It is claimed to be quite hardened. We have around one hundred of their 550 and 575 boxes deployed and they seem to work pretty well although I prefer the PIX. The SG can do much more, but the PIX does what it does better.
No personal experience, but could a LinkSys/WRT45g with custom linux load be even cheaper?
Probably.
Can a cisco 1600 run PPPoE?
I've never tried it, but if they can run 12.2, they should do PPPoE. R Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211 "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin
Current thread:
- NETGEAR in the core... Robert E . Seastrom (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Henry Yen (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Joe Maimon (Jul 30)
- RE: NETGEAR in the core... Sam Crooks (Jul 31)
- Message not available
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Henry Yen (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Janet Sullivan (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Brad Knowles (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 31)
- Re: NETGEAR in the core... Roy (Jul 31)