nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change?
From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol () JustThe net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:03:05 -0800
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
To me, it's not a productive effort to micro-manage(or MERIT)the list via the FAQ. The FAQ is a traditional and historically acceptable method of answering questions that are bound to come up repeatedly as a primary result of new participants from any source.
Micro-managing isn't a good idea, period. Having actual answers available in the FAQ *is* a good idea.
-- JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol () JustThe net PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED) Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
Current thread:
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Hannigan, Martin (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Jim Popovitch (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Paul Vixie (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Joe Johnson (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Scott Weeks (Jan 04)