nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change?
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:12:47 -0500
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:56 -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
But. It's a band-aid, in the short term, and won't do much to 'unalienate' (disalienate?) those who have departed, by choice or otherwise, because of moderator actions.
Perhaps, just perhaps, the best advice for NANOG is *less* moderation, more acceptance of diverse opinions, and even greater self-control. Alternatively having the mailinglist MTA rate-limit posts might not be a bad thing either. -Jim P.
Current thread:
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Hannigan, Martin (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Jim Popovitch (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Paul Vixie (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Joe Johnson (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Scott Weeks (Jan 04)