nanog mailing list archives
Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose
From: Joe Rhett <jrhett () meer net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:16:10 -0800
It is a matter of choosing a registrar that has the right business model and services to suit the registrant.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:28:51PM +0000, Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:
What if a company doesn't want to deal with any registrar? What if they just want to register their domain name and have it stay registered.
I really can't think of any domain name registrant that this statement doesn't apply to -- even the spammers. <shrug> The purpose is so that someone can do all the "paperwork" for when that customer needs to change something ;-) -- Joe Rhett Senior Geek Meer.net
Current thread:
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) George William Herbert (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Richard Parker (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- Registrars serve no useful purpose Michael . Dillon (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose William Allen Simpson (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose Joe Rhett (Jan 21)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose Steve Sobol (Jan 22)
- Registrars serve no useful purpose Michael . Dillon (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose David M. Besonen (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose David M. Besonen (Jan 19)
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) John Curran (Jan 22)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 22)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) John Curran (Jan 23)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)