![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process)
From: George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:51:41 -0800
I want a "transfer process" that is inherently difficult, if not broken, for domain names that are business assets. I don't care about "competition" between registrars, or how much I get soaked for by the registrar and registry, or how evil and/or retarded one or both are.
The problem that got us here was that registrars have historically been not flexible enough at releasing domains when the owners *did* want to transfer them. What you are saying, is that you want to have either a level of service at registrars, or a new registrar with the additional level of service, that instead of being easy to deal with in moves, is designed to maximally ensure safe handling of your important corporate identity. I think this is a clear and wonderful business opportunity. Just expect to pay more for it... -george william herbert gherbert () retro com
Current thread:
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) George William Herbert (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Richard Parker (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- Registrars serve no useful purpose Michael . Dillon (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose William Allen Simpson (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose Joe Rhett (Jan 21)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose Steve Sobol (Jan 22)
- Registrars serve no useful purpose Michael . Dillon (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose David M. Besonen (Jan 19)
- Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose David M. Besonen (Jan 19)
- RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) John Curran (Jan 22)