nanog mailing list archives
/24 route propagation, how long is reasonable?
From: Michael Airhart <mairhart () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:22:07 -0600
Quick question for the group..How long should I be patient to wait for some /24s to become fully routable worldwide?
None of the addresses are mine, they came from the upstream (only one provider)They are all part of the upstreams IP space, and I had assumed that they would have kept them as part of a larger block and just blackholed into their network.. Instead it seems that route filters had to be propagated WW before the traffic would leave a given AS..
I can reach the nets now (after the first day) from most of the ASs out there, as seen from traceroute.org... But, as my luck would have it, the two nets that I connect from can't get there (die at the handoff to the next AS). I have confirmed this from other people on a few other ASs as well.
It has been two days now.. I don't want to be one of those PITA customers you guys get tired of, but I have work to get done.. How long should I sit on my hands?
Note: I would post the /24s, but I don't want to call negative attention to a SP that might be doing his/her job just fine and I just have unrealistic expectations..
Thanks in advance! Michael
Current thread:
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym, (continued)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "an Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "an Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "an Barry Shein (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Steven Champeon (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 13)
- /24 route propagation, how long is reasonable? Michael Airhart (Jan 13)
- Re: /24 route propagation, how long is reasonable? bmanning (Jan 13)
- Re: /24 route propagation, how long is reasonable? Jon Lewis (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Rich Kulawiec (Jan 13)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 14)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 14)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Dave Crocker (Jan 13)