nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL scomp
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:53:29 +0530
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:02:23 -0500, Vinny Abello <vinny () tellurian com> wrote:
Forwarded mail shouldn't be rejected as a result of SPF if your mail server is using SRS to rewrite the from addresses in the "mail from" part of the SMTP transaction of the forwarded emails... as long as your SPF record isn't messed up of course. :)
No point in implementing SRS There is however a point in asking people who persist in publishing -all records to consider changing those to ~all or ?all, and then telling people who treat spf hard failures as 100% sign of spam not to. --srs (fresh from watching a Meng Wong / Dave Crocker / Jim Fenton panel at apricot 2005) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- RE: AOL scomp, (continued)
- RE: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Forwarding spam (was Re: AOL scomp) J.D. Falk (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Mark Radabaugh (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Rich Kulawiec (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Matthew Crocker (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Vinny Abello (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Matthew Crocker (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 25)
- Re: AOL scomp John Osmon (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Matt Taber (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp james edwards (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Feb 25)
- Re: AOL scomp Rich Kulawiec (Feb 26)