nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL scomp
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:40:05 -0500
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:28:58 EST, Matt Taber said:
It's too bad that about 1/3 of the reported mails are valid opt-in lists.
Proof that any network management or security or anti-spam scheme that implies end users with functional neurons is doomed from the get-go.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Jeff Wheeler (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Matt Taber (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp chuck goolsbee (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Michael Loftis (Feb 24)
- RE: AOL scomp andrew2 (Feb 24)
- RE: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Forwarding spam (was Re: AOL scomp) J.D. Falk (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Matt Taber (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Jeff Wheeler (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Mark Radabaugh (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Edward B. Dreger (Feb 24)
- Re: AOL scomp Rich Kulawiec (Feb 24)