nanog mailing list archives
Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Gadi Evron <gadi () tehila gov il>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:31:39 +0200
Dave O'Shea wrote:
They do have people in an LA office, as I got a call from one of them when I had a BGP session to them go down due to a max-prefix which had been exceeded. I guess if you have three times the population of the US, you're going to have one or two "black hats".
Undoubtedly.It would still be my guess there are more black hats in the US. The problem with China is a ton of compromised machines and close to no incident and abuse handling. Not to mention centralized coordination.
Gadi.
Current thread:
- ChinaNet Contacts Jon R. Kibler (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave Crocker (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave O'Shea (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Hannigan, Martin (Feb 17)