nanog mailing list archives
Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Dave O'Shea <daveoshea () sbcglobal net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:24:30 -0800 (PST)
They do have people in an LA office, as I got a call from one of them when I had a BGP session to them go down due to a max-prefix which had been exceeded. I guess if you have three times the population of the US, you're going to have one or two "black hats". --- Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:48:40 -0800 (PST), Dan Hollis wrote:>From what I understand the answer is no. PeopleI know who have attendedasia-pacific regional network meetings describedthem as "clueless". As of this past Summer, this was no longer true for all of China Telecom. In fact they had started putting in enough effort that I am confused about the current round of problems being described. Any chance of trying to get some granularity to this? As I understand their operation, there are enormous differences among the operations in different provinces. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
Current thread:
- ChinaNet Contacts Jon R. Kibler (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave Crocker (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave O'Shea (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)