nanog mailing list archives
Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:34:50 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
[BGP/170] 00:04:21, localpref 200 AS path: 7473 17557 17557 17557 17557 5400 15169 I Singtel -> Pakistan Telecom -> British Telecom -> Google. AS17557 is leaking its BGP table, and AS7473 is not filtering its customer. Bad network, bad. No cookie.and... sbgp would have fixed this for us! :)
SBGP would have. But SIDR produced security extension might not (at least not initially) because cross-peer authentication is not part of the initial work requirement at wg formation. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Erik Sundberg (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Chris Stone (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Mark Foster (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Bill Sehmel (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis william(at)elan.net (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Chris Stone (Dec 13)