nanog mailing list archives
Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:06:59 -0500
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:02:42PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
You'd be better off with an AS-PATH, but just follow the chain... Savvis -> Singtel -> Pakistan Telecom -> Seabone -> Google. Where I'm from, we call that a routing leak. Doesn't take too much work to guess where either. :)
Oh and FYI it is still going on, though the route just changed 4 mins ago: [BGP/170] 00:04:21, localpref 200 AS path: 7473 17557 17557 17557 17557 5400 15169 I Singtel -> Pakistan Telecom -> British Telecom -> Google. AS17557 is leaking its BGP table, and AS7473 is not filtering its customer. Bad network, bad. No cookie. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Erik Sundberg (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Chris Stone (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Mark Foster (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Bill Sehmel (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis william(at)elan.net (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 13)
- Re: www.google.com latency/packet loss/very slow thru savvis Chris Stone (Dec 13)