nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus )
From: "Edward B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:09:52 +0000 (GMT)
DO> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:08:49 -0800 DO> From: Douglas Otis DO> This is a third-party acting in good faith, albeit performing a check better DO> done within the session. In your view, there is less concern about delivery DO> integrity, and so related DSNs should be tossed. Being done within the DO> session would be ideal, of course. When their architecture does not support Let's use some hyperbole: Say that the latest megaworm chucks out spam at speeds resembling SQL Slammer. The return-path specified is your email address. Millions of MXes send _you_ bogus DSNs "in good faith". Is this acceptable? If not, where do you draw the line -- and does that line apply to others, too? Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
Current thread:
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity, (continued)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Douglas Otis (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Todd Vierling (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Andrew - Supernews (Dec 11)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Micheal Patterson (Dec 11)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 11)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Rich Kulawiec (Dec 11)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity Matt Sergeant (Dec 12)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) mary (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Steve Sobol (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) mary (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Edward B. Dreger (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Todd Vierling (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Micheal Patterson (Dec 09)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Micheal Patterson (Dec 09)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Micheal Patterson (Dec 09)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (wasRe:Clueless anti-virus ) Micheal Patterson (Dec 09)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Rich Kulawiec (Dec 10)
- Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity (was Re:Clueless anti-virus ) Micheal Patterson (Dec 09)
- Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober) Todd Vierling (Dec 07)
- Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober) Edward B. Dreger (Dec 07)
- Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober) Douglas Otis (Dec 07)