nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:54:10 +0200
On 10-aug-2005, at 18:48, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
This creates the situation where people try to make do with a /56, find out that they need a /48 after all (all those /64 ptps...) and have to renumber.
ah... so is there the admission that renumbering in IPv6 is pretty much a myth?
Renumbering hosts in IPv6 is a breeze. You just change some settings in the routers and the rest happens automatically.
It's more renumbering information in the DNS and filters and such that's a problem, regardless of IP version.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Elmar K. Bins (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning sdb (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Mark Andrews (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Daniel Senie (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning David Conrad (Aug 10)