nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:06:29 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 10-aug-2005, at 2:54, Randy Bush wrote:on this side of the puddles, i think most folk use /126s for p2p links. this has been endlessly and loudly debated, but it still seems extremely strange to use 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses for a p2p link.Well, if you want to be really environmentally conscious, do away with that /126 too and just use link-locals, with a single global address per router for management and the generation of ICMPs.
and you ping the customer links how? (or did I miss the point of the link-locals?)
Current thread:
- IPv6 Address Planning Cody Lerum (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning kawamura seiichi (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Alexander Koch (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Elmar K. Bins (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning sdb (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Alexander Koch (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 09)