nanog mailing list archives

Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent


From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:36:22 +0200


On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
Is Cogent filtering the prefixes they get from Verio?  Or is Verio 
filtering what they send to Cogent?  Does it matter?

Or OT tagging their announcements to Sprint in a way that prevents them
being announced to Cogent in order to force Cogent into buying transit.

I think you have a very good point - FT is buying full transit.  Cogent 
is the one without full reachability.

Indeed. That's the inherent danger of "playing tier 1".

I myself find being tier 2 much more comfortable. :-) I'm not sure
wether the effort to become (and maintain!) tier 1 status (and I'm
talking of the technical term == transit free) is economically a good
idea (anymore).

Doesn't mean that FT didn't know this would be a problem when they took 
the step, though.

I wonder how much non-BGP-transit traffic is on Cogent (static
customers, colocation). My guess is that it's quite low and one might
say "well, BGP routes around the problem". People do have multiple
upstreams (often seen in the setup "primary Cogent because of price, and
1-2 others secondary for quality and resilience").


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0


Current thread: