nanog mailing list archives
Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 11 Apr 2005 21:38:35 +0000
if we still had moderation, i feel sure that i'd've been kicked off the list by now for my attention to needless detail in this hairy thread. "hit D now"
So, I guess I'm wondering.... how is what BIND9 does substantially different than the case I've outlined above?
the modem vendors you were referring to believed that they were extending the existing mo/dem specification. authors of BIND9 and tinydns each believe that they are implementing what's written in RFC 1035. so, different. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND, (continued)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Apr 12)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 13)
- RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Neil J. McRae (Apr 13)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Mark Boolootian (Apr 11)
- Message not available
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
- RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND andrew2 (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 11)
- Message not available
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 12)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Etaoin Shrdlu (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Stefan Schmidt (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 10)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Robert Boyle (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND sthaug (Apr 09)