![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:11:47 -0800 (PST)
--- Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
I can't speak for Paul, but, I propose that the government stop telling me what I do or don't need, and what risks are or are not acceptable for my family and allow me to make those choices for myself.
This belief == libertarianism, no? I take it you'd rather inspect your own food processing plants, and not have a licensing system in place for elctrical work (et. al.)? Personally, I'm quite glad for government regulations regarding food safety, home inspection, and lots of other things which are safety related. There are other restrictions which I'm not thrilled about, but I have yet to hear a compelling reason (which does not inherently boil down to a libertarian argument) to stop requiring that anything which defines itself as a phone-based voice service should have a working 911 connection. The VoIP companies currently call themselves "phone" companies, and by doing so, IMO, they open themselves to this level of regulation.
If I want 911 service, then, I should subscribe to at least one telephony service which provides it, and, which charges me for it. If I am willing to risk life without reliable 911 service, then, that should be my choice, and, I should be able to choose voice carriers which do not provide 911 service and I should not have to pay for it.
Should you be able to subscribe to the fire department? How about the police? That's how it used to be, but that model didn't work nearly as well as universal coverage paid by taxes does. David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
Current thread:
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ), (continued)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Eric A. Hall (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Eric A. Hall (Mar 31)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) David Barak (Mar 31)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Paul Vixie (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) just me (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) David Barak (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Adi Linden (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Bill Nash (Apr 01)
- Message not available
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
- Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Adi Linden (Apr 01)
- Positioning technology Roy (Apr 01)
- Re: Positioning technology Joel Jaeggli (Apr 01)
- Re: Positioning technology Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 01)
- Re: Positioning technology Joel Jaeggli (Apr 01)
- Re: Positioning technology Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 01)