nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:26:10 GMT
None -- when you disconnect [correct, block, whatever] abusive end-systems in your administrative domain. Act locally, think globally. In fact, an ISP in AUS just did this last week... - ferg Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: How much functionality are we going to destroy before we realize that you can't fix end-node problems in the transit network? -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden, (continued)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Robert M. Enger (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Greg Boehnlein (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Apr 27)