nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10GE access switch router
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:19:06 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I don't promote or use Extreme in my networks, but I knew about the product. He asked, so I just sent the link along. All that was requested was 10G and 1U/2U... so there you have it. I didn't reply to debate why Extreme sucks.
Every manufacturer sucks in some respect. The S400 doesn't suck in an L2 aspect, it just sucks in an internet L3 routing aspect. I can tell plenty of suckage on the Cisco 3550/3750 for instance, but certain people seem to like it alright anyway. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California, (continued)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Aviva Garrett (Sep 28)
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Dennis Dayman (Sep 28)
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Roy (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California ed (Sep 28)
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Dave Hilton (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Joe Hamelin (Sep 28)
- 10GE access switch router Frederic NGUYEN (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert Blayzor (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert Blayzor (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 29)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Joe Hamelin (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Aviva Garrett (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router John V. Messina (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Bill Woodcock (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Deepak Jain (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert A. Hayden (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Scott McGrath (Sep 30)