nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10GE access switch router
From: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor () inoc net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:15:20 -0400
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
The Summit 400 is an excellent L2 unit but a bad L3 unit. It isroute-cache based with only a few thousand cache entries. Put more than a thousand flows (flows=destination IPs) on it and it'll choke.
I don't promote or use Extreme in my networks, but I knew about the product. He asked, so I just sent the link along. All that was requested was 10G and 1U/2U... so there you have it. I didn't reply to debate why Extreme sucks.
-- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor () inoc net PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/ Key fingerprint = 1E02 DABE F989 BC03 3DF5 0E93 8D02 9D0B CB1A A7B0 Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?
Current thread:
- Earthquake in Northern California Dennis Dayman (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Aviva Garrett (Sep 28)
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Dennis Dayman (Sep 28)
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Roy (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California ed (Sep 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Earthquake in Northern California Dave Hilton (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Joe Hamelin (Sep 28)
- 10GE access switch router Frederic NGUYEN (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert Blayzor (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert Blayzor (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 29)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Joe Hamelin (Sep 28)
- Re: Earthquake in Northern California Aviva Garrett (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router John V. Messina (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Bill Woodcock (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Deepak Jain (Sep 28)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Robert A. Hayden (Sep 29)
- Re: 10GE access switch router Scott McGrath (Sep 30)