Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178

[Bill Manning <bmanning () karoshi com>]

well....

RIPE is the RIR for Europe.  RIPE-229 is, from my viewpoint, arbitrary 
and capricious.
the root servers are -ONE- set of interesting servers.   what about the 
web sites that point
to these "important" documents?  or the time servers, or my NOC & 
monitoring machines?

The idea of an Internet Registry stepping into giving routing advice is 
a leap of faith.
An RIR can tell you what was delegated - but presuming to give advice 
on what is important
for everyone that uses IP protocols is over the top.

so no, i don't use this document as a guideline for "golden networks".  
 the advice on
dampening is important tho and it worthwhile.


On Sep 3, 2004, at 3:44, Rodney Joffe wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> This is actually NANOG applicable, despite referring to RIPE... ;-)
>
> How many of you who manage BGP speaking networks implement the RIPE 
> "best practices"  regarding dampening parameters  for so-called 
> "golden networks"?
>
> See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/routeflap-damping.html
> and
> http://www.qorbit.net/documents/golden-networks (thanks, Steve!)
>
> If you do, what parameters do you use, or do you not dampen the 
> "golden networks" at all?
>
> If you don't implement ripe-229, why not?
>
> If there is enough interest/response (i.e if anyone besides me feels 
> this is a real operational issue currently and wants to deal with it), 
> I'll work on compiling the responses and producing a report.
>
> Note: A *significant* number of networks appear to *not* follow 
> ripe-229 guidelines at all.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodney Joffe
> CenterGate Research Group, LLC
> http://www.centergate.com
> "Technology so advanced, even WE don't understand it"(R)