nanog mailing list archives
[OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate
From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:33:54 -0400 (EDT)
Howdy, After some senseless Googling, I'm at a loss. I'm looking for a very comprehensive, up-to-date example of an AUP that covers spam. When I say "modern", I mean that I want it to include not just direct spamming, but abuse of remote open-relays, abuse of remote trojaned boxes, sending through a third party that circumvents the local AUP, etc. Some good definition of "requested email" would be great - ie: double opt-in, or single opt-in with some documentation that the user requested the mail on a web form or similar. Some language that covers penalties would also be helpful, such as equipment seizure for non-payment of penalties. Please reply privately and I'll summarize. I do not wish to get into any debates about what qualifies as spam on this list. Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork () inch com
Current thread:
- [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate Charles Sprickman (Oct 08)
- Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate Charles Sprickman (Oct 08)
- Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate Michael . Dillon (Oct 11)
- Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate Steve Atkins (Oct 11)