nanog mailing list archives
Re: People being removed from the list and such
From: marc van hoof <mvh () marcvanhoof com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:26:29 +1000 (EST)
uh oh - i think that may have been chris's last email 8-) -marc. On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Malayter, Christopher wrote:
It has come to my attention that recently several people have been censored from posting to the nanog@ list. I find it a bit unusual that from such an open discussion list that membership would be censored without notice and reason to the rest of the membership. I wouldn't normally be the one to post this, but the people who have been censored in some cases I believe to be extremely valuable people to the list. My question is this: When people are removed/censored, be it temporary or permanent, could we have a notice posted to the membership as to the person, reason, and duration? Also, I realize that this sounds odd, could we add an appeals process? The idea of a single person with unilateral control over such a group, without taking into consideration the needs and desires of the group, does not seem fair. I believe that there is need for recourse in this community for a person who is removed or censored unfairly. Regards, Chris Malayter TDS Telecom - Network Services Network Management and Operations chris.malayter () tdstelecom com Phone: (608) 664-4878 FAX: (608) 664-4644
Current thread:
- People being removed from the list and such Malayter, Christopher (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such marc van hoof (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Randy Bush (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Bill Woodcock (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Richard Welty (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Matthew McGehrin (Oct 18)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Dr. Jeffrey Race (Oct 19)
- classic literary forms bmanning (Oct 19)
- Re: People being removed from the list and such Richard Welty (Oct 18)