nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI


From: Henning Brauer <hb-nanog () bsws de>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:38:07 +0100


* Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> [2004-11-28 19:51]:
there are a lot of organizations now having PI without having an ASN
and beeing multihomed. a transition to v6 with this policy would make
things much worse for them, so why should they?
They shouldn't unless they need features that are available in v6 that
are not available in v4.  Where's the harm in this?  The v6 stack provides
for encapsulating v4 addresses in v6 easily enough and the v6 specs already
make allowance for this.  I don't see any reason we need to get such a site
over to v6.

ehm the v4-in-v6 mapping is a gigantic security issue. this is nothing 
but establishing tunnels automagically and extremely dangerous. 
v4-in-v6 is not supported on purpose or at least disabled by default on 
many OSes, and that is a good thing.

so you say they should just keep v4 - that does not really help in 
getting v6 deployed.

on the other hand, 1 ASN -> 1 v6 prefix does not necessarily mean 1 v6
prefix -> 1 ASN. might work out
While I think a policy of "If you qualify for an ASN, you qualify for a
prefix" makes sense, I do not think that the reverse makes any sense
whatsoever.

ack.

The convenience factor _is_ already outlawed.
true for new allocations, but there is a gigantic installed base, and
making their situation worse isn't exactly helping in getting v6
deployed.
As near as I can tell, there's very little reason for such a site to ever
adopt v6 and very little reason for the world to care that they didn't.

i think there's many many many more of those sites than you think.
and we really don't want to run in two parallel universes for longer 
than it has to be...

As such, I'm not sure I understand why this is a significant issue.  Is
there some reason it's important for these sites to go to v6 instead of
using 4-to-6 address encapsulation at their border?

4-to-6 is a horrible mess.

-- 
Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
hb () bsws de - henning () openbsd org
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)


Current thread: