nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI


From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:26:17 +0100


On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
there are a lot of organizations now having PI without having an ASN 
and beeing multihomed. a transition to v6 with this policy would make 
things much worse for them, so why should they?

Agreed, but currently we are at "no PI for anybody but ISPs". How about
first solving the PI-denial problem for those who technically need it?
"Convenience PI holders" are a different problem space as you don't
have to account for routing in solving it.

on the other hand, 1 ASN -> 1 v6 prefix does not necessarily mean 1 v6 
prefix -> 1 ASN. might work out.

Exactly.


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0


Current thread: