nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc1978 help
From: Jess Kitchen <jk () burstfire net>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:15:45 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Jeroen Massar wrote: [snip]
3/ I got the following. ls it normail? why there is connection to the broadcast address tcp 0 1 202.64.230.8:33397 192.168.255.255:25 SYN_SENT255.255 or anything ending in 255 doesn't need to be a broadcast interface. Welcome to the wonderful world of CIDR :)
This is probably a bounce headed toward deliberately broken MXes - anyone else seeing a lot of this lately? (tons of domains with conspicuously common nameservers, serving up unreachable A/MX and hosing queues) J. -- Jess Kitchen ^ burstfire.net[works] _25492$ | www.burstfire.net.uk
Current thread:
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Joe Shen (Oct 31)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 01)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Joe Shen (Nov 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 01)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 01)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Joe Shen (Nov 01)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Alexei Roudnev (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Richard J. Sears (Nov 04)
- RE: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Charlie Khanna - NextWeb (Nov 04)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Chris A. Epler (Nov 05)
- rfc1978 help adrian kok (Nov 05)
- Re: rfc1978 help Jeroen Massar (Nov 05)
- Re: rfc1978 help Jess Kitchen (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: rfc1978 help Jeroen Massar (Nov 05)
- Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Chris A. Epler (Nov 05)