nanog mailing list archives
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <christian.kuhtz () BellSouth com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:43:07 -0500
On 11/15/04 11:03 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:29:25AM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:On 11/15/04 12:18 AM, "Daniel Roesen" <dr () cluenet de> wrote:Unfortunate, even today there are not many option of transit ISPs who have a real native dual-stack deployment (I consider 6PE to be native)... most have just tunnels inside. Currently I cannot think of more than... hm... 3-4 ISPs who can deliver real amounts of native US-EU bandwidth.What sort of customers do these v6 SP's have for IPv6? What demands are there for real amounts of IPv6 bandwidth?I've historically found that there are a number of FTP sites that get congested on IPv4 but are accessable via IPv6 (only).
But that's an artifact... There's no reason rooted in the protocols themselves (and associated business reasons) as to why that should be a lasting benefit. It's merely a reflection of poor capacity management and idle (under utilized) IPv6 stacked server capacity.. Thanks for playing, though :).. Regards, Christian ***** "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." 118
Current thread:
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?, (continued)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? John Curran (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Joe Abley (Nov 13)
- who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Pekka Savola (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Randy Bush (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Daniel Roesen (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 15)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jared Mauch (Nov 15)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 15)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 15)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Mike Leber (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)