nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:03:06 -0500
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:10:03 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
only leaf sites use the 32 bit AS numbers. 32 bit AS numbers for transit ASes are best avoided until everyone has upgraded.
Umm... I'll bite.. ;) How do we know/tell that "everyone" has upgraded? (As opposed to just saying "It's been N+4 years now, everybody must have upgraded by *now*"?) Of course, we *could* always declare "everybody" as "98% of the sites that have good contact info in the various Whois databases are ready to go, the rest know about the issue, and those with bum contact info will get what they deserve when we deploy" :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?, (continued)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Jeroen Massar (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Simon Lockhart (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 14)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Jeroen Massar (Nov 15)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 16)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? J.A. Terranson (Nov 19)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Jeroen Massar (Nov 19)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Alex Bligh (Nov 16)