nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:27:14 +0100
On 12-nov-04, at 5:03, Paul Vixie wrote:
There is currently no PI in IPv6 unless you're an internet exchange or a root server.
...but i really do think of 2001:4f8::/32 as PI, even though ISC is neither an IX nor a rootserver. (f-root has its own /48, which is something else.)
ARIN says:NetRange: 2001:04F8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 - 2001:04F8:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:F
FFF:FFFF:FFFF CIDR: 2001:04F8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000/32 [...] NetType: Direct AllocationI don't exactly know what this means, but something called "allocation" that's bigger than what a single organization could possibly need for its own use doesn't smell like PI to me.
Current thread:
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?, (continued)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? bmanning (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 11)
- RE: IPV6 renumbering painless? Tony Hain (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Joe Abley (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Daniel Roesen (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Joe Abley (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Paul Vixie (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Joe Abley (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Joe Abley (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Jeroen Massar (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Randy Bush (Nov 13)