nanog mailing list archives

Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested


From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () sunet se>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:47:37 +0100

--On torsdag 11 november 2004 09.36 -0600 Adi Linden <adil () adis on ca>
wrote:

RFC1918 address space is free and plentiful for my purposes. It is
provider independent. It is globally unique in the sense that no other
publically routed network is using them. My globally unique address will
come from my provider of the day. NAT is my technology of choice to
connect to the global internet, but other solutions are possible.

You are probably going to fare well behind your D-Link residential plastic
box. Most people do, as long as they accept the spoon-feeding media model
and stay away from potentially dangerous things like trying to challenge
who gets to publicise things and whatnot. 

Anyway, there are other issues with non-unique addresses. Enterprises
*WILL* use them, in large,
expensive-to-renumber-since-we're-stupid-and-don't-use-DNS schemes.
Enterprises merge. I'll gladly hand out the marshmallows to roast on the
crash-and-burn fire when "unique behind my firewall" isn't. 
 
If I understand correctly, ipv6 will force me into using provider
dependent globally unique address space. 

Yes, as long as you don't run a LIR. (One can argue whether this is The
Way, I don't agree, but basically, this is what stands for now)

Unless my provider of the day is
required to assign me address space that is and/or permanently assigned
and portable it does not meet my needs. Why not? I am not willing to
renumber when I change providers. 

You are stuck in a v4 model. Renumbering is fun and healthy. In a
residential setting, it should be near automagic. 

I have no problem using NAT to obtain
connectivity from provider B using providers A address space internally.

Your applications might have issues. Mine do, and I don't like them
complaining. Unique is Good(tm). 

But that only works if provider A is prevented from reusing 'my' addresses
if I terminate my contract.

They are not yours, and why bother anyway? Just digits. (if you say
"security", wrong answer, go back and relearn.)
 
And what do I do if I build my network without ties to any provider? Can I
go to ARIN to get globally unique address space, an ipv6 /48? Without
RFC1918 that would be my only choice to prevent from overlapping my
network with someone elses.

There is an issue here -- various schemes have been presented (research
ships, planes, anything) that are exotic at best, yet we can't completely
ignore them. However, I do not think non-unique prefixen are the way to go.
See above under "mergers". 
 

-- 
Måns Nilsson         Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC
                        MN1334-RIPE

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: