nanog mailing list archives
Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
From: Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:14:33 -0400
At 05:00 PM 17/05/2004, Joe Boyce wrote:
Not to thread jack or anything, but when I first moved our cluster to Spam Assassin, I was disappointed at the amount of messages that would get past Spam Assassin at even a low threshold of 2. I Googled around and found a bunch of rulesets that once installed, started tagging those hard to get messages.
Also, use the various RBLs in the scoring. e.g. add 50% of the threshold score if its on spamcop and 25% for some of the other more aggressive RBLs. We have a very high and correct hit rate as a result. Our users can then add white lists for the handful of their contacts that get tagged as spam since they are using spam friendly ISPs.
---Mike
Current thread:
- Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Claydon, Tom (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Joe Boyce (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Mike Tancsa (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Raymond Dijkxhoorn (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Petri Helenius (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Steven Champeon (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Dan Hollis (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Joe Boyce (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 17)