nanog mailing list archives
Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
From: "John Neiberger" <John.Neiberger () efirstbank com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:11:57 -0600
"Jared B. Reimer" <jared () theriver com> 5/17/04 2:48:16 PM >>>We have done an eval of this same product (model 400). It is very
cool in
virtually every regard except one: performance. We were facing 1+
hour
mail delays (!) through the device when pumping less than 1,000,000 messages per day through it. Given that they claim it can handle ten
times that much, I am left wondering what happened. Very
disappointing in
that regard; the eval unit is being shipped back as a result. --
Jared Did you not receive some basic support from them during your evaluation? A perceived 90% drop in performance is pretty significant and I'd imagine that they'd be interested in helping to determine the cause. John --
Current thread:
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall, (continued)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Port 5000 Geo. (May 18)
- Re: Port 5000 Erik Haagsman (May 18)
- Re: Port 5000 Doug White (May 18)
- Re: Port 5000 James Reid (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Jared B. Reimer (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Jared B. Reimer (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall jlewis (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Majdi S. Abbas (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Christopher X. Candreva (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Todd Vierling (May 18)