nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamcop
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:28:21 +0530
Vicky Rode writes on 5/12/2004 12:21 AM:
Just wondering why was my e-mail thread (Hierarchical Credit-based Queuing (HCQ): QoS) dated 5/9/2004 9:36 PM reported as a spam? Just
That question is best asked of the admin of widowmaker.com, a user of which reported your nanog post to spamcop.
Received: from [198.108.1.26] (helo=trapdoor.merit.edu) by wilma.widomaker.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BN2ZP-000Jo6-00 for x; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:39:15 -0400
srs -- suresh ramasubramanian suresh () outblaze com gpg EDEDEFB9 manager, security and antispam operations, outblaze ltd
Current thread:
- Re: Spamcop, (continued)
- Re: Spamcop Robert E. Seastrom (May 12)
- Re: Spamcop Eric Brunner-Williams (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop chuck goolsbee (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop JC Dill (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)