nanog mailing list archives

Re: Can a customer take IP's with them?


From: Richard Welty <rwelty () averillpark net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:10:30 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:40:06 -0700 David Schwartz <davids () webmaster com> wrote:



a TRO against nacs.net has no effect on the behavior of providers
such as verio who won't honor the advertisement of the subnet
in BGP. the customer would have to, one-by-one i think, go after
everybody with the relatively common policy of ignoring such
advertisements (isn't sprint one of these? that'd be a pretty big
hunk of internet to be disconnected from. sprint having no
contractual relationship with the idiot, er, customer in question,
it'd be hard for the customer to get anywhere there.)

in other words, by itself the requested TRO incompletely solves
the problem, making it fairly pointless.

      We don't know enough about the specifics to know if this argument works or
not. There are two obvious cases where it doesn't:

      1) The block in question is large enough (or located in legacy space) such
that most/all providers will listen to it anyway.

maybe. many filtering policies against legacy space are pretty severe
(e.g., filter at /16 for legacy B space.) you'd have to have a block of /20
or larger for modern allocations.

      2) The customer's new provider meets with their old provider directly and
the new block is inside a larger block the original provider will continue
to advertise. (This is a very common case if both providers are large.)

      It's worth pointing out, however, that if case 2 applies and case 1
doesn't, then the ISP will still be providing a level of actual packet
carrying service to the customer.

bzzzzt. if the ISPs have sensible policy implementations at the border,
nobody will be be providing free transit because of accidents of
adjacency.

richard
-- 
Richard Welty                                         rwelty () averillpark net
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
    Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security


Current thread: