nanog mailing list archives
RE: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!)
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:27:43 -0400
Why would the other side(new provider) violate ARIN policy and route the space? The court order doesn't apply to ARIN, or the new provider. I'd say it would be a violation of the agreement, but I'm not a lawyer. Just a thought. -M -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018 Network Engineer IV Operations & Infrastructure hannigan () verisign com
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Brad Passwaters Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:02 PM To: Matthew Crocker Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:45:40 -0400, Matthew Crocker <matthew () crocker com> wrote:The TRO is irrelevant, The courts made the wrong decision,did anyoneactually think they would have a clue? Here is the solution:Perhaps before proposing a solution we should make sure that all the facts are in evidence. I might suggest since at least some of the legal documents are available to you at the url below you take time to read them. http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/nac-case/ Its not clear at all that what the courts are proposing is that the customer be allowed to keep the addresses forever, just that they have adequate time for an orderly move. Its also not clear that NAC won't receive comensatation for use of their resources. I think those people who have done service provider moves realize that without the help of their old service provider their life could well be hellish. If the requirements for the lack of IP portability are indeed purely technical and not some effort to hold onto customers then service providers have a duty to make almost any reasonable effort to make the transition as painless as possible -- Brad Passwaters ------------------------------------------ brad.passwaters () gmail com
Current thread:
- RE: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!), (continued)
- RE: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Michel Py (Jun 28)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 28)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 28)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 28)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 28)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Johnny Eriksson (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Henry Linneweh (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Randy Bush (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Randy Bush (Jun 29)
- RE: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Michel Py (Jun 28)
- RE: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Hannigan, Martin (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Brad Passwaters (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Doug White (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Richard Welty (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Jon Lewis (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Richard Welty (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 29)
- Re: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!) Nils Ketelsen (Jun 29)