nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart () tech org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:22:20 -0700
I'd be extremely surprised if anyone were planning to block all mail from non-SPF-using sites any time soon. However, it'll still be useful as an additional data point in a filtering decision process.
Indeed, running the spfmilter/libsfp2 combo in "--markonly" mode and noting the details of the inserted headers has been instructive enough to justify the couple of minutes spent setting it up. Stephen
Current thread:
- SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Joel Jaeggli (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Gerald (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Petri Helenius (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Stephen Stuart (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Edward B. Dreger (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Robert Blayzor (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Mike Leber (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Douglas Otis (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Douglas Otis (Jul 27)