nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:41:03 +0300
Gerald wrote:
It does, I´ve also been advocating for them to implement reverse maps for servers responsible for distributing updates so they could more easily be identified but to no avail.Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use, but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet? AOL is leading the way by publishing their SPF records. I can understand not implementing the blocks or delays yet, but publish the records ASAP.
Pete
I think this will be the next best thing in E-mail. I'd love for that date to be August 1 though. FYI SpamAssassin 3.0 has / will have SPF checks built in. Gerald
Current thread:
- SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Joel Jaeggli (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Gerald (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Petri Helenius (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Stephen Stuart (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Edward B. Dreger (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Robert Blayzor (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Mike Leber (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Douglas Otis (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Jul 28)