nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regional differences in P2P
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 15:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
you can also be fairly accurate from the flow data.. eg genuine web traffic is short small transfers, P2P is long-lived flows of continous high usage
In the long run, there is no way to accurately determine what kind of traffic everything is, and short of making encryption illegal and doing deep packet inspection, there is no future for those kinds of measures anyway. Only way I see is to use L3 information as that's basically the only thing we're asked from our customers to handle (in most cases anyway), we move packets from one IP address to another IP address. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Regional differences in P2P, (continued)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Petri Helenius (Jul 17)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Alexei Roudnev (Jul 17)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 16)
- RE: Regional differences in P2P Michel Py (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Jared Mauch (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Petri Helenius (Jul 17)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Hank Nussbacher (Jul 17)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Walter De Smedt (Jul 18)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 18)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 18)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Walter De Smedt (Jul 18)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 19)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Jared Mauch (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 16)
- Re: Regional differences in P2P Petri Helenius (Jul 18)