nanog mailing list archives
Re: Outbound Route Optimization
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:43:15 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
In any case, no matter how many resources or black boxes you have, you cannot guarantee good performance on the 'Net. Too many people involved over which you have no control. Even if you had control, BGP is not the right tool to exert such control in all cases.
Even more reason for people to buy the Sugar Mountain RouteMaster5000. No matter how good the claims are, you still end up with humans in the mix dictating "policy" of some sort over packets.
Current thread:
- Outbound Route Optimization Jim Devane (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Phil Rosenthal (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Paul Vixie (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization vijay gill (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Paul Vixie (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 22)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 22)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization vijay gill (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 23)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Sean Finn (Jan 26)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 26)
- Re: Outbound Route Optimization Sean Finn (Jan 26)