nanog mailing list archives
Re: example.com/net/org DNS records
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 03:27:02 +0530
Roger Marquis [1/5/2004 3:19 AM] :
This is the best explanation I've read so far. Problem is, it's not a compelling rational. Is this really the only reason for assigning NS and A records, violating the RFC, and breaking thousands of spam filters in the process?
What spam did you see that forged example.* in the sender envelope / rDNS?example.* is well worth special-casing, I dare say, if you find spam being sent with it in the headers.
-- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- example.com/net/org DNS records Roger Marquis (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Roger Marquis (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Roger Marquis (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Roger Marquis (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Brian Bruns (Jan 05)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records bill (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Leo Bicknell (Jan 04)
- RE: example.com/net/org DNS records Jeroen Massar (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Colm MacCarthaigh (Jan 05)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records bill (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: example.com/net/org DNS records Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jan 04)